Friday, February 27, 2026

Playing Team Yankee in 6mm Scale

 I have been running into a lot of folks looking to play Battlefront's World War III: Team Yankee (TY from here on out) in 6mm scale. Instead of typing the info over and over and over again, I decided to put it all here in Truncheons & Flagons (T&F for short), and just point folks to this article whenever it comes up. Let's get into it!

What are you talking about?

 TY is played in 15mm or 1:100 scale (with the strike aircraft at 1:144 scale). In your own home game, or unofficial store game, you can change any part of the rules that you want. Many folks realized that if you want to get more miniatures onto the table, give yourself some more maneuver room, or in the case of TY over other historical games, make the movement and shooting distances closer to reality, you can play the game in a smaller scale, as well as change some other rules, and gain some or all of those benefits. I am far and away not the originator of this idea, as I heard it from a friend roughly 10 years ago that got me hooked on the idea. Even some of the authors of TY have commented that their game would work better in a smaller scale, but their production facility was already set for 15mm scale, so they stuck with that. Other huge benefits to downscaling is saving money on the models and terrain, as well as saving space in storing all of the above.

 There are several smaller scales to choose from - 12mm, 10mm, 6mm, and 3mm have the most models available on the market, and there are other scales are available out there - but I think 6mm is the most popular as there is the widest variety of alternative model manufacturers, both here in the US of A, as well as in other countries, particularly England. Another reason 6mm scale has become dominant is one of the manufacturers has been around since the 1960s providing 6mm scale models to actual militaries around the world for use on their planning sand tables, and they include an astonishing amount of detail in their miniatures even as tiny as they are. It is a bit awkward of a scale conversion, as it's less than half the size of 1:100, but more than a third the size, but in spite of that, it is still the most popular of smaller scales.

 Another thing to consider is that, even in the 6mm scale manufacturing world, there are two different 6mm scales - the manufacturers in Europe/England tend to use 1:300 scale, and the North American manufacturers are just a little chunkier at 1:285 scale. The only time this matters is when you have the exact same model (say, an M1 Abrams tank) from two different manufacturers side-by-side, and then you can spot the difference. If you do decide to follow us into this hobby, keep that in mind to try and buy all of one type of model from the same manufacturer, or at least another manufacturer using the same definition of "6mm scale". Even if you don't realize it, having similar models next to each other in different scales will make your subconscious mind nag at you that something is off. 

Rule Change Possibilities

 Before I get into this, let me repeat that as this is completely unofficial, and I encourage you to discuss with your friends and local players what would work best for your group from the following. I am definitely not, I say again NOT insisting that you do exactly what me and my friends are doing, this all can be adjusted to suit your situation and group. Also, even though there are other rules and homebrews that are being used out there, I will only be discussing the scale changes that I have seen or thought of. I may do a gathering of other rule possibilities in another post here on T&F, but that's a future project.

  One option is what I call "half scale", and is what me and my group of misfits use. Basically, instead of trying to figure out the exact ratio from 15mm down to 6mm (and the slight variation in 1:285 and 1:300 scales), we just halve everything. Plus it's easier to do the math that way, no repeating decimal points to worry about. When I say "everything", there are obviously some exceptions to that for my group - Movement distances are halved, but Weapon Range distances are not halved; all of the Templates (smoke, minefields, artillery) are halved; In Command and Contesting Objective distances are halved, but Night Vision distances are not halved; the standard TY table size of 6 feet by 4 feet is not halved; and infantry bases and Objective Marker bases are halved. That's it, easy as that. We like the few exceptions we have adopted as not being halved, as weapons feel like they are too short in the 15mm game, so this extends the engagement range. My group goes further and also bases all of our vehicles as well, which allows us to put labels on the bases for easier identification on the table (and the labels make the vehicles and infantry stands be more visible when they are placed in terrain on the table), and the bases keep "tank parking lots" from happening, as we don't allow bases to overlap, so there is always a gap around vehicles.

 Another popular option I have seen is "change nothing", and while you are at least changing the scale of your miniatures, it is the easiest because that is all that you do differently from standard TY. This is even easier than our half scale games, as most folks already play TY in the original 15mm scale when they adopt 6mm scale, so they already have most of what they need (just need to buy some 6mm scale miniatures and terrain). 

 The last option is what I call "centimeter conversion", where you read all inch measurements instead as centimeters. For example, the range of the .50cal AA MG on American tanks (the venerable M2 "Ma Deuce") has a range of 20 inches. In centimeter conversion, it has a range of 20 centimeters. Everything is converted - templates, distances, infantry bases, et cetera, et cetera. This is actually closer to a 15mm to 6mm scale conversion, as 6mm scale is ~30 to 35% the size of 15mm, and a centimeter is 39% the size of an inch. And if you don't base your vehicles, and change your table size as well - instead of 6 feet, or 72 inches, by 4 feet, or 48 inches, to 72 centimeters (28.34 inches) by 48 centimeters (18.89 inches) - you can play a "pocket" version of the game, great for smaller play spaces and more portability.

 Not so much a conversion as it is a house rule or acceptable practice, another suggestion is infantry - infantry miniatures in 15mm scale are small as it is, and 6mm scale ones are damn near microscopic. So if you do not feel like painting super teeny-tiny infantry figures for your tabletop wargame, then don't. Take the appropriate sized base (for whatever conversion size you choose, whether it's change nothing, half scale, or centimeter conversion) and then right on the upper surface what that stand represents (M16 Rifle Command Team, RPG-7 Anti-tank Rocket Team, whatever). 

 Another question I frequently get is "do you glue the turrets on your vehicles?" I always answer, "depends", and no, not because I am so advanced in age that I need adult diapers. If the vehicle is a tank (ie: has a Front Armor that is very different from its Side Armor) or has a large turret, than I don't glue the turret. If the vehicle has a small turret and has very low and similar Front and Side Armor ratings, then I will glue that turret. For tanks that have different Front and Side Armor values - let's use the T-80 for example, since I have the card handy: 20 Front, 10 Side - there may come a time when your opponent is shooting at your tank and the facing of the turret matters. As in, I have run my Leopard 1s (with AT 19 cannon) onto your T-80s Side Armor (because I can't penetrate them thru Front Armor 20, now can I?), and you reacted by swiveling your turret to shoot back. Every time I hit that T-80, I now have to roll an additional die to see if I hit turret Front, or hull Side. So in this case, having the turret separate and able to swing around is important, because it lets the players know when you are doing that. But for most of your support vehicles (artillery, AA, APC/IFV, recon), their Front and Side Armors are both very low and similar enough that it won't make a difference in a close fight which way the turret is facing, so I glue those turrets to have less chance of losing them. As always, if you or your opponent have any questions about the rules or what is happening on the table, talk it out like rational adults. 

 Unspoken in all of this is, again, the unofficialness of these conversions, and I want to stress again that these are all suggestions and not hard, fast rules. If you like the idea of half scale, but want to not base your vehicles and play on a half-sized table? Go for it. Or half scale where everything is halved, even the table size? Do it. Mix and match, play around and see what works for you. My group of friends started with half scale as I described, and we've tried parts of the other conversions, but this is what we like and works the best for us and our situation - easier math, we like the longer engagement ranges but slower movement so that there is more maneuvering happening during each game, and because there were already accessories for the half scale conversion available on the market (more on that in a second). One of the other conversions, or parts of all of them, may work better for your group. And there may very well be rule changes that I have not heard about or thought of - that's fine, do what works best with your group and situation.

Manufacturers, Accessories, and Support

 As promised here are a bunch of manufacturers that make modern military miniatures in 6mm as well as accessories specifically for TY.

  • GHQ Models - this is the "big dog" in the 6mm scale miniatures world. Founded in the '60s, they've been supplying 6mm models to civilian gamers and military planners alike for six plus decades, and have some of the best looking miniatures in the space. They are also the most "expensive", but at USD$13.99 for 5 tanks versus Battlefront's normal MSRP of USD$55 for 5 tanks, expensive is relative. GHQ is also the only manufacturer still in the United States, and they make their miniatures in 1:285 6mm scale. GHQ has a large catalog, with miniatures and terrain on offer, though not everything that one would see in a TY game, yet still more than everyone else in one place.
  • Legions IV Hire - this Canadian manufacturer bought out PFC C-in-C, a former US manufacturer in the 6mm space, when the founder of that company retired. Legions bought all of their molds and still produces their line. Legions doesn't have as varied of a selection as GHQ does, but they do have some miniatures and terrain pieces that GHQ does not offer, and again, they are on the North American continent, so shipping is not as steep as from the EU/English shops (though with Trump's tariffs swinging wildly about, who knows what the total cost will be when your order finally arrives). Also, Legions is a little cheaper than GHQ, at CAD$14 for 5 tanks as opposed to USD$13.99 for the same. Legions, like GHQ, is manufacturing their models in 1:285 6mm scale.
  • Heroics & Ros - this is the biggest competitor to GHQ for dominance of the 6mm miniatures world, but they are based in England and make their minis in 1:300 6mm scale. If you are in the EU or England, highly recommend checking them out as they have a little bit of everything for TY, including some models that the other manufacturers do not carry. And again, even cheaper than both GHQ and Legions IV Hire.
  • Scotia Grendel - the other English (actually Scottish, but since I'm an "uneducated American", I can pretend like there isn't a difference between the two) manufacturer, SG has a smaller catalog than H&R and GHQ both, but they still have some vehicles not offered by anyone else, so keep them in mind while you're out there buying up your force. Price is very comparable to H&R, and like H&R, SG makes their miniatures in 1:300 6mm scale.

 Those four are not the only manufacturers of 6mm miniatures, but they are the main ones I point out to everybody as practically anything you need to play TY can be found in their catalogs. Here are the others where 6mm may not be their main focus, or the modern era may not be their main focus, or even all you can find from them is terrain in 6mm scale. 

  • Pico Armor - a major source of 3mm scale miniatures. Wait, did I just say 3mm scale? Yes, and there is a reason I mention them here. Remember all the way back up at the beginning of the article when I said that Battlefront's miniatures are 1:100 scale, but their strike aircraft are 1:144 scale? They do the smaller scale for the planes so they don't overwhelm the table (planes, as it turns out, are HUGE in real life), and it also makes them look like they are flying higher over the battle than they actually are. So my group settled on Pico Armor's fantastic (and super affordable, even more so than 6mm models) line of 3mm modern strike aircraft for our game. Also, Pico Armor sells fantastic metal flight stands that I use with their planes, though they are a bit too small to work with the bigger 6mm scale helicopters. Why not 3mm helicopters along with the strike aircraft? Because you can land your helicopters, and they generally fly a lot closer to the ground, so I wanted to keep them at the same scale as the tanks and other vehicles.
  •  Baccus - one of the longest running manufacturers of 6mm scale miniatures, but sadly, not a lot of modern (or 1980s modern) equipment. Still, they do have a decent WW2 line, so you are sure to find some miniatures that are still being used, and terrain pieces for your table.
  • Irregular Miniatures - another long running manufacturer, and about to change hands, management-wise. Has some modern miniatures in 6mm scale.
  • Butler's Printed Models - a manufacturer offering modern military hardware that they produce via 3d printing, and they offer them in a variety of scales, including 6mm.

  Here are a bunch of accessories specifically playing TY in 6mm that I have found and/or use in my own game.

  • Wargames Accessories - This is where I get all of the bases I use in TY in 6mm, both infantry/Objective, as well as for my vehicles (a 20mm by 40mm base works great, even for the largest of artillery pieces). For infantry, I use Move Stand 04, 3/4" x 1/2", for small; Move Stand 10, 1" x 3/4", for medium; Flames of War FOW 1, 1-1/4" x 1", for large and Objective markers; and Move Stand A3 for for the vehicle bases. I also buy magnetic sheets from these very friendly folks, and line the bottom of scrap booking trays (like these), and the metal bases kinda stick to the sheets. It's not the best, but it is better than nothing.
  • Litko - Formerly Litko Aero, they've moved away from focusing solely on airplane wargame accessories, and expanded into generic and specific accessories for a wide variety of tabletop wargames. For TY in 6mm, I particularly love their acrylic micro flame markers (this and this, get a bunch of each to mark all the carnage on the table), and also love their micro smoke markers. Another great supply I get from Litko is Craftics #33 acrylic cement. Litko doesn't make that cement, but is where I found it, as it works not only on acrylic pieces like the Litko markers and other accessories, but also on PLA 3d prints. This cement MELTS whatever you are trying to adhere together, you seriously have about 3 to 5 seconds after putting the pieces together to get it oriented just right before it is forever one solid piece. Use in a well ventilated area, Craftics #33 has a high VOC off-gassing.
  • GCMini - Carries a wide variety of accessories for 6mm gaming, like terrain, but I want to point them out specifically for their pre-cut acrylic, half-sized Team Yankee artillery and salvo artillery templates, as well as small, medium, and large infantry bases. Great bunch of folks, and they're in the US of A.
  • LaserCraftArt - A UK producer of laser cut accessories, mostly in MDF instead of acrylic, but they also make specific half-size templates, bases, rulers, and even tokens for TY and Flames of War. Very handy to have.

 Lastly, 3d printing. This "hobby within a hobby" has grown by leaps and bounds since I started with a simple Creality Ender 3 almost a full decade ago. And now you can get going with a much better filament printer that does many of the bothersome details (bed leveling, flow rate, gantry leveling) for you, or even a basic resin printer for about the same purchase price as what I paid for that Ender 3. Now, admittedly, the resin printer will set you back more money as you also want to buy a wash and cure station to go along with it, plus all the other resin handling safety equipment, but you will get a lot more finer details from the resin printer. And my new filament printer is far better than that old Ender 3, and I'm able to get a ton of 6mm scale terrain out of it, but 6mm vehicles are a bit too small, and 6mm infantry is right out. So there are upsides and downsides to both, I strongly suggest you watch some 3d printing experts on YouTube to get an idea of what you should be purchasing, as I am just a dabbler in the 3d printing world, not a "professional", not even a "pro-sumer", just a regular old "consumer". I do strongly suggest this series of videos if you want to get started in resin printing, along with this video and this video from the same gentleman. For filament printing of miniatures, I cannot recommend this channel enough (I may be able to do 6mm vehicles better if I followed his suggestions more closely) and here is another good channel for both resin and filament printing of miniatures and terrain.

 As to where to find models (known as "STL" files), I will first point you to Yeggi, which is a STL specific search engine, but I find I can almost get just as many good results by adding "stl" to the end of any search I do in Google. And realize, you can change the scale of anything in your slicer. Only able to find 15mm scale whatevers specific to Team Yankee? Shrink them down to 35% of the original and print away! There are other things to consider, like how much detail are you losing when you scale down a STL file, but there are other, more qualified folks out on the internet who discuss that type of thing, and I suggest you track them down for help there. 

 Before I leave, let's talk about savings of 6mm over 15mm miniatures - the savings are immense. Not going to sugarcoat it, the savings are immense. And the amount of 6mm miniatures you can carry in a similar sized bag as your 15mm force? It's just mind boggling how much more you can bring with you. Same for your terrain, where before you would have shelves FULL of little buildings and roads and hills and trees and whatnot, now you can fit that on one shelf. With room to spare to put other stuff. Don't believe me, here is a comparison of the most affordable packs of vehicles Battlefront sells, an American Armored Cavalry Troop Starter Set, and the equivalent from GHQ, the most expensive range in the 6mm space.

  • 5x M1 Abrams
  • 4x M2/M3 Bradleys
  • 3x M109s
  • 2x AH-64 Apaches
  • 2x HMMWV TOWs
  • 1x HMMWV Mk19
  • 1x HMMWV M2
GHQ buy - $69.95 + CAD$42 + flight stands
Note: I like the C-in-C HMMWVs because they come with little infantry figures manning the weapons, so I splurged and went with them instead of the GHQ ones.

 I know, the savings are not immense for this deal, but it's not just the dollar amounts, it's the fact that buying from some of these manufacturers (GHQ and Legions IV Hire specifically), you cannot just buy an individual vehicle, you are buying a pack of 3, 4, 5 (usually 5), or sometimes more! So yes, in this one case, you are spending more than buying the 15mm models... but you're already leaning towards expanding your Force. Two more HMMWV Scout Sections are already sitting in your possession, just waiting for you to pay the points for them and roll them out. Yes, you'd have to buy another pack of M109s to get a full battery of six, but that extra pack will run you $13.99 vs $33 for just three more M109s!! With two packs of M109s from GHQ - that's ten M109s with the longer barrel and four extra stubby barrel M109 turrets that you can use them in a Canadian or West German force - you can run a battery of six and a battery of three, or even three batteries of three! (yes, you can do it, take a Cav Squadron list that has M109s inherent to it, and then two Divisional Support options of M109s, perfectly legal, which tells you if you want to spend the points on it, you can field 18 M109s in a Formation, but only one FIST allowed) All of that for $27.98, which is still less than the $33 you pay for just three! Or look at the Abrams, you get five in the starter set for a great price, but what if you want to expand your list? Well, five Abrams from Battlefront will run you, outside of the starter set, $55. Or just $13.99 from GHQ, but you do have to pick between M1 or M1A1 Abrams when you buy from GHQ.

 There are some downsides as well - in the starter set, you get a smaller, paperback set of the rules, you get some dice, and you get flight stands for your aircraft. If you are just starting out in Team Yankee, you will have to source a rulebook separately and if that includes you, I suggest searching eBay for the "team yankee softback rule book", as that is an easy format to guillotine off the spine and spiral bind so it lays open flat while playing (they do sell digital PDF rules directly, if you don't want a physical copy). Remember, you want "World War III: Team Yankee" and not the other way around, as this is the most recent rules edition. Why eBay? Plenty of folks buying multiple starter sets and getting rid of their extra rule books for next to no money. As for the dice and tokens, I suggest buying one of the themed tins that Battlefront puts out, they'll have all the tokens you need, plus plenty of dice, and it all comes in a really neat tin. Flight stands? I had originally tried Litko's acrylic flight stands, but the metal magnets aren't really sticking well with the super glue I'm using, so I'm currently trying to 3d print some smaller stands for my helicopters. 

 Hopefully all of this was interesting and informative to you. I really enjoy playing teeny tiny tanks with my friends, as you can probably tell from all of the BatReps I've posted over the years. One of these years, we will have our shit together, me and my TY in 6mm playing friends, and go to one of the many semi-local gaming conventions and put on a demonstration for the folks in attendance. Get out there, roll some dice with your friends, and have some fun!

Monday, September 29, 2025

TY 6mm Lessons Learned 25

This is a short one, because it's not a full BatRep and I don't have any pretty pictures. Just a couple of thoughts from yesterday's game (West German Leopard 2s vs Polish T55s and T72Ms, at 150 points).

Numero Uno - your ATGMs (anti-tank guided missiles) with the Guided ability can also fire at your opponent's helicopters (page 39 in the rulebook) but only in your Turn, not as Defensive AA Fire in your opponent's Turn. My opponent in yesterday's battle forgot this, and as he had not gotten his Spandrels in position to shoot at my vehicles early (like all ATGM carrying vehicles, they have to be Halted to fire the ATGMs at all), they spent several Turns trying to catch up to the battle line to fire into my vehicles. He could have Halted them one Turn and fired at my PAH strike helicopters instead, possibly removed them from the game before Turn Four (or was it Five...?) as he did. And FYI, I don't think I've run into an ATGM that doesn't have Guided. Plus, this goes for your Infantry ATGM Teams, too, so all those Milan-spam British lists you want to play just became murder to any group of helicopters (not because they just changed the rule, but because you now know to use your Milans in this manner). Lesson Learned.

Numero Dos - less a Lesson to be Learned, and more a general observation that may become a houserule in our little club. My opponent spent 18 points on six Su-22 Fitters (with the Kh-25 missiles) that never showed up in six Turns of trying. My own flight of Tornados only made it one Turn out of six (though they were devastating in that Turn, wiping six T55s out with one bomb run). Yes, even with a 50% chance each roll, we got Strike Aircraft on once out of 12 rolls! We are pondering how we can make the Strike Aircraft Roll more like the Reserves roll. The proposed change is that if you fail to bring in your Strike Aircraft, next Turn you roll two dice instead of one, and if you fail again, instead of three dice on the third Turn, you automatically get in your Strike Aircraft. Once you get your Strike Aircraft, you go back to rolling just one die the following Turn. As Anti-Aircraft fire has gotten a lot more deadly on the table with the many additions to the army lists of all countries, I think getting your Strike Aircraft in more often won't necessarily unbalance the game too bad. Do note that we don't utilize Dynamic Points in our game, we just use the standard points that are in the book/on the Forces website, so this may be unnecessary when using Dynamic Points. We will give this a try in future games and report back on how well it's working for us. Houserule Experiment Begun.

Numero Tres - this is definitely a reminder to us as we are bad about forgetting small details, but to you, dear reader, as well. Even with the smaller scale we play in (which is why we can field a 150 point battle with 50 tanks on a standard 6' by 4' table without feeling crowded), often we get Units separated by Destroyed Teams and terrain, and we forget to add the +1 to Shooting for the Teams Out of Command. It may not be much, but in a game as close as last night's game, it could have been over sooner. We are also bad about using the Movement Orders (pages 36 and 37 in the rulebook). Oh, we do Blitz and Shoot & Scoot often enough, and we do Dig In when we bring Infantry and they don't start the game already in Foxholes (I bring Infantry the most of the group, and even then I don't move them much in games), but I can't tell you the last time any of us have used Cross Here or Follow Me. And these are important Movement Orders, especially for our little group. Cross Here - my opponent from yesterday has long been known for failing Cross Checks, but always forgets to issue a Cross Here Order before moving into Terrain. Seriously, you have never seen so many 1s and 2s on 3+ Cross Checks as my friend throws (you can probably go back through our Lessons Learned and figure out who I'm talking about, look for the player with half a company of tanks stuck in the same patch of woods for an entire game, not just once but multiple times), but he - all of us, really, let's be honest - never uses Cross Here. Follow Me - especially for horde lists that need to cross the table quickly to get into those coveted Side Armor shots (as we witnessed first hand yesterday, T55s can't penetrate Leopard 2s from the Front, but a Leo 2 doesn't even get an Armor Save against the same T55s from the Side), the extra movement can be key. When playing bottom-tier tanks vs top-tier tanks, your best bet is to use Dash Moves and Follow Me, moving from cover to cover, to get your bottom-tier tanks into position to shoot at Side Armor. No point in using Tactical moves when Shooting can't even penetrate the Armor you're facing, so move as fast as you can to a flanking position. Why not just use Blitz? If you successfully Blitz (or even fail a Blitz), you can only do a Tactical Move afterwards, while Follow Me allows Dash Moves. And Blitz is far more useful for those Units that need to be Halted to fire their big guns (ATGMs, usually, but also tanks that have Halted 2, Moving 1 RoF) and just a little bit of Movement to get into firing position. Lesson Learned.

Numero Quatro - making your opponent react to you (rolling an easy Armor Save, placing a Ranged In marker even though you plan on moving it the first chance you get, placing Minefields in open Terrain to force Cross Checks through Difficult Terrain... any dice rolls, really) is better than not doing the whatever. In the example above of bottom-tier T55s not being able to penetrate top-tier Leo 2s from the front, if you are running mid-tier T72Ms that can penetrate Leo 2s from the front even though they have an easy Armor Save (3 to tie, 4 to beat), it's better to force your opponent to roll that easy Armor Save. Best to do it from Cover (or even better, Shoot & Scoot back into total Concealment so they have no Line of Sight) so your mid-tiers aren't trashed by those top-tiers in return, but forcing more rolling of dice by your opponent means more chances for your opponent to fail those rolls. Maybe you can only Bail your opponent's tanks - keep doing it! Double Bails on a vehicle is a chance for them to fail a Remount roll and run from the battle. A Bailed tank can't Hold/Contest Objectives, and doesn't count towards Unit or Formation Morale, and they may fail their Remount rolls, exacerbating this state of affairs into the next Turn. Keep making them roll, just don't place yourself in utter danger to do it. Placing Ranged In markers at the beginning of the game, even if you mean on moving them on Turn One, will give your opponent pause, make them react - even subconsciously - to the threat, make them shy away from placing troops under the Artillery Template. And placing a Ranged In marker during Deployment is the only time you get a free placement. You can't fail a Roll if you don't roll the dice in the first place. Make them react to you, take the initiative from them, even if it's forcing them to do things unconsciously, is what you want. Lesson Learned.

Numero Quatro, Bonus Edition - speaking of Minefields, have you ever noticed that NATO army lists don't get to add mine plows to their tanks? Even though, in the real world, all NATO countries used mine plows or mine rollers of some sort? Yeah, so who gets to place Minefields in Missions? Defenders, which is usually what NATO players pick. But if you're a brash WarPact player, pick Defender, and if NATO picks Maneuver (or Attacker, more on that in a moment), you can get your own Minefields... and the NATO player can't remove them (at least with vehicles, and many players don't bring much Infantry because TY is a vehicle-focused game), they can only avoid them. Or drive through them and take their chances that the dice favor them on that roll. On the other side of the coin, who gets to pick what time of day the battle occurs in the Missions? Usually the Attacker, which is usually the WarPact player, but who has the better night vision devices? NATO players, of course. Do you gamble and choose Attacker to get a chance of Time of Day, knowing that you will have fewer numbers of better trained men and equipment to try and take Objectives, or do you play it safe and pick Maneuver or Defend and count on your WarPact opponent staying safe and choosing Daytime? Something to think on, for both NATO and WarPact players. Bonus Lesson Learned.

Numero Cinco - short one, if you can take a Unit in your Formation, or for the same cost, take that Unit from Divisional Support, take it inside the Formation. Divisional Support doesn't count towards Formation Morale. They do count towards Victory Points, if you're bothering to count them, but if you don't care, use your Divisional Support elements as ablative meat shields and keep your Formation whole, longer. Short Lesson Learned.

Okay folks, enough for today. Like I said, a short article, sorry for the lack of pretty pictures, which I know is why most of you come back to read my drivel. Hopefully your own game can improve from my thoughts, or you can get a chuckle from us idiots who are just realizing the blistering obvious. Either way, get out there and roll some dice with your friends.

As a bonus, here are the two lists we used in our little tête-à-tête yesterday:

WEST GERMANS

  • Leopard 2 Kompanie HQ - 1x Leopard 2
  • Leopard 2 Platoon - 4x Leopard 2
  • Leopard 2 Platoon - 3x Leopard 2
  • Marder Panzergrenadier Zug - 3x MG3 Teams, 2x Milan Teams, 1x Carl Gustav Team, 3x Marder 1s
  • Jaguar Panzergrenadier Zug - 3x Jaguar 1s
  • Gepard Flakpanzer Batterie - 4x Gepards
  • Luchs Spah Trupp - 2x Luchs
  • Luchs Spah Trupp - 2x Luchs
  • M109G Panzerartillerie Batterie - 4x M109Gs
  • From Divisional Support:
    • 1x M113 OP
    • 4x PAH Anti-tank Helicopters
    • 4x Tornados

POLISH

  • T-72M Tank Battalion HQ - 1x T-72M (Formation 1)
  • T-72M Tank Company - 6x T-72Ms
  • T-72M Tank Company - 6x T-72Ms
  • BDRM Scout Platoon - 2x BDRM-2s
  • T-55AM2 Tank Battalion HQ - 1x T-55AM2s (Formation 2)
  • T-55 Tank Company - 10x T-55s
  • T-55 Tank Company - 10x T-55s
  • T-55 Tank Company - 10x T-55s
  • BMP Scout Platoon - 3x BMP-1s
  • 2S1 Carnation Artillery Battery - 6x Carnations
  • SA-9 SAM Platoon - 4x Gaskins
  • ZSU-23-4 SAM Platoon - 4x Shilkas
  • From Divisional Support:
    • 6x BM-21 Hails
    • 3x DANA SP 152mms
    • 1x BMP-1 OP
    • 3x BMP-1 Scouts
    • 6x Su-22 Fitters (with Kh-25 missiles)

Wednesday, July 23, 2025

TY 6mm Lessons Learned 24

I know it's been a bit since I've posted one of these, loyal readers, but all I can say is life is interesting of late. And remember, "may you live in interesting times" was an ancient Chinese curse, not a blessing.

Another month, another game of teeny tiny tanks, specifically our favorite ruleset, Team Yankee in 6mm scale. We had four players this month, myself, the ever-reliable Uriah and Brandon, and Brandon's teenaged son Logan. To get everyone playing, I declared it would be a 2v2 match, 50 points per player. I would take Logan on my team and as Uriah prefers his British Force (he is working up some French, as well) I said we would play Warsaw Pact versus their NATO lists. As I have plenty of teeny tiny tanks at my disposal, I have plenty of WarPact to go around, and Brandon is likewise known to purchase and print many vehicles across the entire line of TY, so no issues there.

Warsaw Pact - for Logan, I gave him a simple East German list I had used before. T72 formation, tank heavy, no artillery or air support, but good amount of Units and firepower.

  • Battalion HQ - 1x T72M tank
  • 1st Company - 4x T72M tanks
  • 2nd Company - 4x T72M tanks
  • 3rd Company - 4x T72M tanks
  • Recon - 4x BMP-1s
  • BMP Motor Rifle Company - 4x BMP-1s, 4x rifle stands, 3x RPG-7 stands
  • AA - 2x ZSU-23-4 Shilkas
  • ATGM - 3x Spandrels (from Divisional Support)

It's not the best, especially if you were to try to run it in a tournament setting, as this Force's main strength is the ablative nature of having so many cheap, not-top-tier vehicles on the board - you may win, but you will lose so many Units, the best you can hope for is a 7-2 or a 6-3 Victory. However, it is a great Force for new players, as there is just a few rules you have to deal with. Thinking back, if I were to make any changes, I would drop the Spandrels entirely as it's not like I don't already have enough cannons (the 125mm on the T72 at AT 21 is nothing to sneeze at) and add 2 more Shilka tracks in. In fact, I'm making the change in my Forces list right now.

For my own Force, I picked T64BVs from the Soviets - they're a great, cheap tank, about halfway between cheap throwaways, like the T72M, and top tier tanks like the M1A1 Abrams. They have a terrific gun, really decent armor (not high, but better enough to be able to survive big NATO cannon fire, though not the super-advanced ATGMs you see in top tier games) and are understandably cheap.

  • Battalion HQ - 1x T64BV
  • 1st Company - 3x T64BV
  • 2nd Company - 3x T64BV
  • BMP Motor Rifle Company - 4x BMP-1s, 4x rifle stands, 3x RPG-7 stands
  • Recon - 2x BMP-1s
  • AA - 4x SA-13 Gophers

I originally had Shilkas in the AA slot, but as I only have 4 Shilka minis in my vast collection (I know, need another 4 Shilkas to add to the collection... sigh) and knowing that NATO would be bringing some air assets, decided to take some missile AA and threaten a greater slice of the table. Again, this is a very basic list - no artillery, no air, just a little bit of the basics (tank, infantry, recon, AA), and even better, there's nothing from Divisional Support so EVERYTHING counts towards Formation Morale. The Spandrels in the East German list are really there to use up the last 2 points to make the list an even 50 points, and so when I run that list, I tend to run the Spandrels very far forward, as I really don't care if they die or not. We tend not to pay attention to VPs anyway, so they are very much sacrificial lambs to me, and if they manage to take out anything on the opposing side before they die, it was the best 2 points I spent that game. And remember, if your ATGM has Guided in the description (I think they all do, but I could be wrong), you can use them against helicopters as well, poor man's anti-helicopter AA.

NATO - Uriah has been faithfully playing British the entire time our small group of TY in 6mm scale players have been meeting, and one of the biggest problems he has faced is that, 1) the Brits have no good low tier tanks (the Americans have the M60 Pattons, and pretty much all the other NATO forces have either the Leopard 1 or a Warsaw Pact option), and 2) he hates infantry in 6mm scale and refuses to field them. At low point totals like in the 50 point per player we played in this game, he suffers. Yes, he could totally have fielded a Medium Recce Squadron or Wheeled Recce Squadron (or multiples of each, combos of each, etc) and just put a metric ton of "cockroaches" onto the table, but he doesn't like that much either. Admittedly, the Brit recce vehicles are all SCREAMINGLY hard to kill (hence why we call them "cockroaches") but they are not very effective at killing enemy tanks in return, even mid-tier WarPact tanks like the T72M, so you'd be better off pairing them with MILAN infantry (but again, see above) or other cheap ATGM vehicles, but you can't take enough of those from Divisional Support or cross-formation. Maybe a Troop of Chieftains and let the Recce be the main Formation. All of the above reasons are why he is also building a French Force in 6mm.

  • Squadron HQ - 1x Chieftain
  • 1st Troop - 2x Chieftains
  • 2nd Troop - 2x Chieftains
  • Recce Troop - 2x Scorpions
  • AA - 3x Marksmen (DivSup)
  • Strike Air - 2x Harrier (DivSup)
  • Helos - 2x TOW Lynx (DivSup)

Brandon had just printed up some S-tanks (Stridsvagn 103s, those funky, turretless defense tanks that literally move the whole tank to aim the cannon) and really wanted to play those. He, like pretty much the rest of us at such a low point total, went tank heavy, with the bare minimum of support, which you'll see in a moment, really restricted his gameplan. But, I have to admit, the S-tank is a fantastic looking tank, really innovative design, and if they are set up correctly in defense (firing from cover to enable their Ambush Tank ability), they are utter BASTARDS to kill. 

  • HQ - 2x Strv 103s
  • 1st Tank Platoon - 3x Strv 103s
  • 2nd Tank Platoon - 3x Strv 103s
  • AT Platoon - 3x Pvpjtgb RBS-56 BILL Missile (DivSup)
  • Helos - 2x HKP 9s

Setup - Here is my one and only warning - I do not "mansplain". Mansplaining is when some over-testosteroned knuckle-dragger explains everything to every woman he runs into as if she was 5 years old. I do not mansplain, but instead, I "NCO-splain". I am a former Non-Commissioned Officer (NCO) of the US Army, so I have been trained to be the babysitter to nearly everyone around me, junior enlisted and officers especially. When I am in a situation where I am instructing someone, like I was doing with young Logan, I tend to revert to my Staff Sergeant years. So if you just hear me instructing in the most condescending tone possible while you are reading this, you probably got it right. Remember, I don't "mansplain", I "NCO-splain", because I'm a professional asshole.

Anyway, the table was, as is our usual, utterly full of trees, rocks, and hills. As surprised no one, and like I instructed Logan, NATO picked Defense and we picked Attack as the Warsaw Pact. A die was rolled and No Retreat was the result. Wait, did I say No Retreat?

Yeah, I said No Retreat

For the unfortunate NATO players, No Retreat should have been a bigger hindrance to us WarPact players in this smaller scale. As we halve all distances (except weapon ranges), it would take us poor Soviet conscripts and puppet states longer to get across the table and start threatening Objectives. However, that downside for the Attacker (WarPact) comes with a HUGE downside for the Defenders (NATO) - Deep Reserves. Deep Immediate Reserves which is not the worst, but Deep Reserves nonetheless - you can only Deploy only one Tank Unit with Front Armor greater than 4 OR only one air Unit. I'll let you scroll back up and refresh your memory of the NATO Formations they had chosen to bring to the fight. Take your time.

Right?! The Brits can only deploy either a Troop of Chieftain or the Harriers or the Lynxes (Lynxii? internet search says "lynxes" or "lynx") and the Scorpions and Marksmen. The Swedes can only deploy a Troop of S-tanks or the helos, and the Pvpt... Pbws... the BILL missile jeeps. Yes, they get an Ambush Unit, but with their Unit makeup, this type of Reserve utterly hampered their Defense plans. To be honest, Logan and I were gracious and let them each deploy a Deep Unit and each have an Ambush Unit, because if we hadn't, it would have been an even quicker game than it turned out to be.

Next lesson for our young gentleman - there are two ways to place the Objectives. You either place them as far apart from each other or you place them as close together. The first one is if you are Attacking, so you divide the Defenders up and they can't support each other in Defense of those Objectives. The second one is if you're Defending, you place them as close together as you can manage, to give mutually supporting fire from the most Units. For No Retreat, Defenders place an Objective then the Attackers place one. As Brandon is a wily player, he placed their Objective as far back in the box as possible, however he put it off to one side where I would have split the difference and put it right in the middle of the box, to keep the Objectives as close to each other as possible. However, he was not playing as competitively as he could have, so his placement and my placement kept the game almost split down the middle - Logan vs Uriah and me vs Brandon, with only a few shots coming across the table. I placed our Objective as far from the NATO Objective as I could get, as far out of cover and concealing terrain as I could get.

As expected, Brandon had his BILL jeeps (Ambush, great idea for ATGM vehicles) and one Troop of S-tanks on the table and everything else in Reserve. Surprising, Uriah did not bring out the Marksmen... but as I double check their card in Forces, Marksmen have a 6 Front Armor. I forget they are on a Chieftain hull and the armor stat is a combination of the heavily armored hull and lightly armored turret. Okay, hindsight, not a surprise after all. Uriah had his Recce Troop of Scorpions as far forward as he could get them (rant incoming in a moment) in the Deployment zone and held his one allowed Chieftain Troop in Ambush.

Spearhead Rant - I always try to put at least one Unit, more at about 85 points and higher, but find that I use it in less than half the games I play. As we are playing the latest Missions Pack from Battlefront, many of them don't have enough standoff between the Deployment Zones to allow any use of Spearhead. But I still bring a Spearhead Unit in every list, because when I can use it, the Spearhead Ability is fantastically useful. We actually get more use out of Spearhead at 6mm scale because every measurement is halved which includes Ambush and Spearhead Deployment distances, yet I did not use the Ability in the game, as the Deep Reserves rule had already made it so difficult for the NATO Forces. 

For the Warsaw Pact Deployment, I advised young Logan our best bet is to make one big skirmish line, get every Unit as far forward in the Deployment Zone and then push on the Objectives as best as possible. He had further to go, but had more Teams and Units to throw at the problem. And with as much terrain as we had put on the table, it was going to be at least one Turn of Dash movement due to not being able to get into any good Shooting positions. Besides, our goal was simple - get onto one or both Objectives as soon as possible and overwhelm the Defenders, preferably before they get all their Reserves onto the table. 

It's a long way, to Tipperary...

My Soviet Force. I know, I know, need to at least get a base coat on them...

Logan's East Germans.

The Objective on NATO Left, protected by minefields and S-tanks.

The Objective on NATO Right, with a minefield and Scorpions up front.

The British Ambush and Reserves waiting to come onto table.

And the Swedes doing the same.

TURN ONE - Warsaw Pact is Attacker and we get to go first. The plan is simple - rush down the table as fast and as far as possible while sticking to cover and only when we start to approach the Objectives do we pop out to start Shooting. And that is what Logan and I do for the first Turn, Dash Dash Dash and no Shooting at anything.

NATO's side of the Turn, and they roll for Reserves, really needing some (and yes, we were gracious and let both Brandon and Uriah roll separately), but they got none, zero, zilch, squat. Just a little panicked now, because I know I was feeling some sympathy for them at the weight of men and equipment bearing down on them, Brandon and Uriah set to work. Out come the Ambush Units, the BILL Missile jeeps (yes, I know, they're not M151 Mutts, the venerable US Jeep, but it's easier than trying to type out the alphabet soup of the Swedish nomenclature for them) (by the way, if you've never heard of Dr. Jackson Crawford, otherwise known as Dr. Cowboy Viking, you should really check out his YT channel on the Old Norse language, which isn't what modern Swedes speak, but a lot closer than any of the Romance languages or English I can halfway speak/understand) facing down my infantry-carrying BMP-1s at WarPact extreme Right, and Uriah's Chieftains in the middle of the table with a shot on my Gophers... wait, my Gophers?! Yup, he'd found a firing lane that caught one of my SA-13 Gopher SAM tracks full on in the open, even though I'd tried my damnedest to keep them well out of sight for the inevitable appearance of enemy air Units. Shooting commenced, and I lost one BMP-1 and a stand of infantry to the BILL jeeps, both of my BMP-1 recon tracks to Brandon's S-tanks, and 3 of my 4 Gophers to Uriah's well sited Chieftains. NATO put the first score up on the board and it stung to be the center of attention. But I couldn't blame them, I was closer to an Objective than Logan, and obviously the more immediate threat.

Turn One... Let's Get it On!

The Soviets advance WarPact Right.

The East Germans advance WarPact Left

Why am I getting all the love?

A heroes' burial for these brave defenders of the Motherland (don't ask why they're invading other countries as a "defense")

TURN TWO - Okay, this got real serious. No Remounts, Reserves, or Strike Aircraft, but I do manage to UnPin my infantry and moved them immediately into the empty seat of a nearby BMP-1, and my last Gopher foolishly decides to stick around (passed Unit Morale). Logan continues to advance at Dash, ignoring the Scorpions off to his right and streaming towards the far Objective. I push up at Tactical, Bogging several T64BVs in the treeline, and shoot at the BILL jeeps and S-tanks to my front to no effect. I don't know if it was this Turn or last, but for at least two Turns and maybe three, I continued to fail all rolls, notably Armor Saves and To Hit rolls. Which is usual for how I roll dice. Side note - looking again at the pictures, Logan had his Motor Rifle BMPs forward, which is good to get the infantry into the fight as early as possible, but his recon BMPs are behind his tanks. I tend to use my recon elements as a screening force for my bigger guns, the ablative meat shield at the front of the Force, which we've discovered only blocks your own shots through the Unit, as your opponent can shoot through your Unit and into a Unit behind it, but I still do it as most people tend to shoot at the closer target instead of the more dangerous target. However, this was his Force to play, and so I made some suggestions every Turn, but otherwise left him to run his army as he saw fit.

NATO side of the Turn, and this time, both rolling two dice, they both get one Unit of Reserves, Uriah picking his other Troop of Chieftains, and Brandon picking his other Platoon of S-tanks. Both Units come in on NATO Right as Brandon felt he'd speed-bumped my Soviets enough that I was no longer the biggest threat and the other Objective seemed to be almost completely uncovered. Uriah further adjusted his Chieftains, moving one out of Command Distance so he could cover Logan's advance on NATO Right, and even brought one of his Scorpions out (the other Bogged) of the trees to go after Logan's Shilkas. Logan's turn to catch some love, and loses one of the Shilkas, two BMP-1s from his Motor Rifle Company along with three stands of infantry, while I lose two more BMP-1s, two stands of infantry, and a T64BV.

Turn Two - Let's Get it On!
Soviets advance, shoot, and... nothing.
East Germans advance.
NATO Reserves entering the fray.

NATO repositioning
East Germans taking some hits
Infantry losses
Soviet losses
Soviet infantry graveyard
East German infantry graveyard

TURN THREE - As in most games of TY, this is where things really get interesting. The last remaining SA-13 Gopher track finally fails Morale and heads for the hinterlands. The Soviets continue to trickle forward, the T64s still Bogging in the trees more than making it through, but still close enough to move up and start Contesting the Objective. The Soviet infantry pile out of their BMPs and go into Assault on the BILL jeeps in the trees to their front. The East Germans continue to move up on their side, the Motor Rifle BMPs doing a suicide charge at the Chieftain to mirror what the Soviets are about to do this Turn but have to wait next Turn for their chance to pile out and Assault. Shooting phase comes around - Soviets finally manage to hit SOMETHING hiding in the trees and take out one S-tank. The Soviet infantry shoots, misses everything, then Assaults, Destroying one BILL jeep and the other two fall back to consolidate... but fail their Cross Checks, and they're removed. Hey guys! I killed a Unit with Cross Checks! That was an achievement. The East Germans fire, killing a Scorpion (no, Logan's new nickname is not "Cockroach Boy", but it could very well be as they are notoriously hard to kill), and fire on everything else on that side that he could see, but no effects there.

NATO side of the Turn, Brandon gets one and Uriah gets two Reserve Units out of three dice rolled apiece, Uriah picking his Chieftain commander and Harriers as there is exactly one Shilka on the table, the last AA for the Warsaw Pact, and Brandon grabs his S-tank command element. All the newcomers roll up to get shots on targets, and Brandon charges his S-tanks out of the woods nearest the Objective to not let us win automatically at the end of the next Turn. Otherwise, everyone else stays where they are at. (One note here, Shooting had already begun for Uriah's Brits, but Brandon had forgotten to move his S-tanks up to Contest the Objective, in case he didn't outright kill the two T64s in the Shooting Phase. However, since we like playing with our friends and not just beating our enemies, I reminded him of this misstep, and he moved one of the S-tanks up, the other failing the Cross Check to leave the woods. Cross Checks were EVERYONE'S bane this game.) On the WarPact Left side of the table, the Harriers get ready to open fire, and Logan's last remaining Shilka opens up, Destroying one Harrier. However, the remaining Harrier manages to Range In on the first roll and launches his cluster munitions (I can't remember which weapon it is, but it's the Salvo template one), hitting only one T72M, and Bailing it after a failed Armor Save and Firepower Check. Uriah's Chieftains and Brandon's S-tanks open up on Logan's Force, Destroying two T72Ms and Bailing a third out of one company, which didn't put Logan anywhere near having to check for Formation Morale (this is the strength of that list - crunch all you want, we brought more!), and the suicidal Motor Rifle loses their last Transports and another two stands of infantry. Brandon tries to Destroy the two T64s I have Contesting the Objective, and finally, FINALLY, the dice go my way (as well as the extra points for the BV models of T64) and I make all of my Armor Saves. Turn Four is now going to be interesting.

Turn Three - Let's Get it On!
Sorry, didn't get Movement pic and then Shoot/Assault, just skipped straight there. And yes, there are as many Bogged T64s in the trees as there are outside. 3+ Cross my ass...
Killing a Scorpion in his first game has made Logan a legend in our group.
The rest of the East German advance.
Movement over on WarPact Right.
Mid-action shot on WarPact Left.
The Harriers launch their attack.
After the Harrier attack.
The S-tanks strike forward. Brandon has to Destroy both T64s Contesting the Objective, but the S-tank that made it out of the woods will at least keep me from auto-winning if those T64s are still there next Turn.
And I live! I made all my Armor Saves!
Outcome on the other side of the table.

TURN FOUR - This is it, crunch-time. With me Contesting the Objective on WarPact Right starting last Turn, if I can remove the one S-tank that is within 4' of said Objective (remember, 6mm scale, all distances are halved), then we win the Mission. It is not looking good for NATO at this point, and Logan was questioning the need to do any of his part as it looked like me winning has highly probable. But, we reminded him, always act like the game will continue, so we made him play out his Starting and Movement Phases while I was taking care of mine. Always a good idea to get those repetitions in. Logan Remounts and UnPins everything, and makes his Morale Checks for everything (the last Shilka stuck it out for another Turn, what an absolute champ). On my side of the table, I rush everything up to consolidate on the Objective, finally getting two of my last three T64BVs out of the trees (yes, my Formation Commander stayed Bogged at the end... sigh) and Dashing them up as I couldn't get a clear shot with them anyway. My infantry and their last Transport also double-timed it towards the Objective. Logan continued his push towards the Objective on his side, finally getting Line of Sight with his T72Ms to many of Uriah's Brits and the few S-tanks Brandon had on this side of the board.

Then the Shooting started... and like that, game was over and Warsaw Pact was victorious. S-tanks are very hard to hit, but only if they are in cover and can use their Ambush Tank ability (raises their Hit On from 4+ to 6), and a lone S-tank out in the open like that facing three T64s? Very low probability of survival there. But Brandon had no choice, he had to either remove the two tracks I had already Contesting the Objective last Turn, or failing that, get as many vehicles onto the Objective as well, make me pull them off. Hopefully, all while Uriah is holding Logan's horde of T72s off the other Objective. And having only two vehicles (after I had Destroyed the third S-tank and all of the BILL jeeps) to pile onto the Objective, one of which is stuck in the trees too far away to help, it was too little, too late. Okay, last of the pretty pictures first and then more thoughts on the game.

Turn Four (and last) - Let's Get it On!
The Soviet Pile-on commences.
The East Germans advance. And yes, those last 2 stands of infantry were going to take on that Chieftain all by themselves.
More East German tomfoolery.
And in the end...

FINAL THOUGHTS - I am by no means a tactical genius, and I completely acknowledge the Mission beat up NATO as much as Logan and I did. The Deep Reserves, especially, and the low point total for the match did Brandon and Uriah no favors. I've already discussed with Uriah about a possible low point list for him with his restrictions in mind - no infantry, but still have enough punch to threaten WarPact MBTs. Here is the list we came up with:

  • Medium Recce HQ - 2x Spartans
  • 1st Recce Troop - 4x Scorpions
  • 2nd Recce Troop - 4x Scorpions
  • 3rd Recce Troop - 4x Scorpions
  • ATGM Troop - 4x Strikers
  • AA Support - 2x Marksmen (DivSup)
  • Air Support - 2x Harriers (DivSup)
  • Cross Formation - 3x Chieftains

The Scorpions, Scimitars, and Foxes of the British Recce Squadrons are cockroaches, very hard to kill, but not very hard hitting, at least not against tanks. We went with the Medium Recce as they have Striker ATGM carriers for their support option, while the Wheeled Recce has some GPMG troops, and again, no infantry (and not an ATGM option). The Striker isn't the best little ATGM carrier, but AT 23, FP 3+ is nothing to sneeze at. The core Formation is only 23 points, which leaves plenty for 3 Chieftains, and a pair of Harriers, plus some Marksmen for AA duty. The Chieftains and Harriers are the big threat, with the Strikers filling in for some long-range striking power, and the Scorpions being great to either sit in cover and be annoyingly hard to kill or running around the board to strike at the lightly armored targets on the other side of the table. With three Troops of them, you can fulfill both tasks at the same time. I'm looking forward to facing it at some point. And do any of us have enough Scorpions for Uriah to use? Yes. I've got 20 (and another 20 Scimitars) in my collection.

Other than that, the dice were everyone's enemy, none of us had consistent good luck. I don't know how either side could have played it differently. Yes, NATO could have pulled Reserves first Turn, or even more Units on Turns Two and Three, but again, the dice were fickle. Brandon and Uriah could have changed up their lists, but they would have had to know beforehand which Mission we were playing, and that's part of the gamble of playing the game the way we do - none of us do, it's completely up to random chance, and you have to be ready for any eventuality. If NATO had gotten a non-Deep Reserve Mission, started the game with 30 points on table and no Front Armor/Aircraft restrictions, WarPact would have had a much tougher time. I'd have come to the Objective with two platoons of S-tanks and ATGM toting helos in support, not to mention the BILL jeeps, and that would have been a war of attrition I don't know I could survive with only 7 tanks and an infantry platoon to break them. 

Speaking of the BILL jeeps, Brandon's use of them as speed bumps for my infantry was fantastic. Well, for him, not so much for me, as he completely stalled my infantry rush up the WarPact Right side of the table. My plan was for the tanks to take Brandon's attention and then, before he realized it, my infantry would be on top of the Objective and Dug In. But that didn't happen. It was very satisfying to Assault his jeeps at the end, they were SSSOOO annoying. 

That's it for this BatRep. I hope to get more posts up here on the site, but life has not been the most cooperative this year. Oh well, it goes like that sometimes. Until next time, hope you can get some games in and roll some dice with your friends!